Shop bestselling products! โž”

CERs with Engineering Graphs Claim Evidence Reasoning CER Activities Graph Data

$9.00

  • Easy,ย 100% Secure Checkout
  • Instant PDF or Zipped File Download
  • Create an accountย to download anytime
    from TeachingScience
secure checkout

Description

This is an Engineering Claim Evidence Reasoning Unit with Engineering Graphs for CERs. Provide CER Activities with clear evidence from the graphs!

Bring engineering design to life with thisย Claim-Evidence-Reasoning (CER) Graph Analysis Unit! Perfect for upper elementary and middle school, this resource engages students in analyzingย real-world engineering dataย to evaluate and improve design solutions.

 

Withย 24 unique, standards-aligned engineering graphs, students practice interpreting data, identifying criteria and constraints, and supporting claims with evidence and reasoning. Each graph is based on an authentic engineering scenario from testing bridge designs to optimizing wind turbines, helping students connect classroom learning to real-world problem solving.

 

Whatโ€™s Included:
โœ…ย 24 Engineering Graphsย โ€“ Each with a ready-to-use CER prompt (printable PDF + Google Slides format)
โœ…ย Student Pagesย โ€“ Digital and print options for flexible use
โœ…ย Graph-Only Slide Showย โ€“ Perfect for projecting during whole-class instruction or discussions
โœ…ย Editable CER Rubricย โ€“ Assess student responses quickly and consistently
โœ…ย Complete Lesson Planย โ€“ Step-by-step guide for introducing, teaching, and assessing CER with engineering graphs
โœ…ย Answer Keysย โ€“ Sample claims, evidence, and reasoning for each graph to support instruction and grading

 

Skills Students Will Practice:

  • Reading and interpreting different types of graphs (bar, line, and pie)
  • Applying engineering criteria and constraints to evaluate solutions
  • Supporting claims with specific data evidence
  • Using reasoning to connect evidence to engineering principles
  • Iterative thinking: suggesting design improvements based on results

Perfect For:

  • NGSS Engineering Design standards (3โ€“5 ETS1, MS ETS1)
  • STEM classes and engineering units
  • Data interpretation practice
  • Test prep for science assessments involving graphs and real-world data
  • Sub plans, bell ringers, small-group analysis, or project-based learning

Standards Alignment:

  • Elementary:ย 3โ€“5-ETS1-1, 3โ€“5-ETS1-2, 3โ€“5-ETS1-3
  • Middle School:ย MS-ETS1-1, MS-ETS1-2, MS-ETS1-3, MS-ETS1-4

Why Teachers Love It:
No prep needed, print or assign digitally! The variety of engineering topics keeps students engaged, while the consistent CER structure builds strong science communication skills. The included rubric and answer keys save you time and make grading straightforward.

 

Graph Pages & Standards Alignment

Bridge Design Challenge โ€“ Weight Supported

3โ€“5-ETS1-1, 3โ€“5-ETS1-2, 3โ€“5-ETS1-3

MS-ETS1-1, MS-ETS1-2, MS-ETS1-3

Electromagnetic Strength vs. Number of Wire Coils

3โ€“5-ETS1-2, 3โ€“5-ETS1-3

MS-ETS1-2, MS-ETS1-3

Ramp Slope vs. Car Travel Distance

3โ€“5-ETS1-2, 3โ€“5-ETS1-3

MS-ETS1-2, MS-ETS1-3

Insulation Test: Temperature Change vs. Insulation Material

3โ€“5-ETS1-1, 3โ€“5-ETS1-2, 3โ€“5-ETS1-3

MS-ETS1-1, MS-ETS1-2, MS-ETS1-3

Temperature Change vs. Time for Different Materials

3โ€“5-ETS1-2, 3โ€“5-ETS1-3

MS-ETS1-2, MS-ETS1-3

Parachute Drop Time vs. Canopy Size

3โ€“5-ETS1-2, 3โ€“5-ETS1-3

MS-ETS1-2, MS-ETS1-3

Windmill Blade Number vs. Voltage Output

3โ€“5-ETS1-2, 3โ€“5-ETS1-3

MS-ETS1-2, MS-ETS1-3

Mudslide Barrier Test: Erosion Loss vs. Barrier Type

3โ€“5-ETS1-1, 3โ€“5-ETS1-2, 3โ€“5-ETS1-3

MS-ETS1-1, MS-ETS1-2, MS-ETS1-3

Oil Spill Cleanup Efficiency vs. Material Used

3โ€“5-ETS1-1, 3โ€“5-ETS1-2, 3โ€“5-ETS1-3

MS-ETS1-1, MS-ETS1-2, MS-ETS1-3

Water Filtration Rate vs. Filter Material

3โ€“5-ETS1-1, 3โ€“5-ETS1-2, 3โ€“5-ETS1-3

MS-ETS1-1, MS-ETS1-2, MS-ETS1-3

Water Bottle Design Comparison: Temperature Control vs. Ease of Carry

3โ€“5-ETS1-1, 3โ€“5-ETS1-2, 3โ€“5-ETS1-3

MS-ETS1-1, MS-ETS1-2, MS-ETS1-3

Paper Airplane Flight Distance Over Iterative Designs

3โ€“5-ETS1-3

MS-ETS1-3, MS-ETS1-4

Wind Turbine Blade Test Results

3โ€“5-ETS1-1, 3โ€“5-ETS1-2, 3โ€“5-ETS1-3

MS-ETS1-1, MS-ETS1-2, MS-ETS1-3

Roof Shape vs. Snow Load Support

3โ€“5-ETS1-2

Coastal Flood Wall Height vs. Water Overflow Rate

3โ€“5-ETS1-1, 3โ€“5-ETS1-2, 3โ€“5-ETS1-3

MS-ETS1-1, MS-ETS1-2, MS-ETS1-3

Bridge Deck Material vs. Maximum Load Supported

3โ€“5-ETS1-2, 3โ€“5-ETS1-3

MS-ETS1-2, MS-ETS1-3

Helmet Design vs. Impact Force Absorbed

3โ€“5-ETS1-2, 3โ€“5-ETS1-3

MS-ETS1-2, MS-ETS1-3

Road Surface Type vs. Vehicle Stopping Distance

3โ€“5-ETS1-2, 3โ€“5-ETS1-3

MS-ETS1-2, MS-ETS1-3

Solar Panel Angle vs. Electricity Generated

3โ€“5-ETS1-2, 3โ€“5-ETS1-3

MS-ETS1-2, MS-ETS1-3

Drone Payload Weight vs. Flight Time

3โ€“5-ETS1-2, 3โ€“5-ETS1-3

MS-ETS1-2, MS-ETS1-3

Electric Car Battery Size vs. Driving Range

3โ€“5-ETS1-2, 3โ€“5-ETS1-3

MS-ETS1-2, MS-ETS1-3

Wind Speed vs. Energy Output for Different Turbine Designs

3โ€“5-ETS1-2, 3โ€“5-ETS1-3

MS-ETS1-2, MS-ETS1-3

Green Roof Coverage vs. Building Temperature Reduction

3โ€“5-ETS1-2, 3โ€“5-ETS1-3

MS-ETS1-2, MS-ETS1-3

Rainwater Collection Tank Size vs. Water Saved

3โ€“5-ETS1-1, 3โ€“5-ETS1-2, 3โ€“5-ETS1-3

MS-ETS1-1, MS-ETS1-2, MS-ETS1-3

Check out my blog post on helping students master CER with graph based practice!